# see https://yaml-multiline.info/
footnote: "
- [4] OPEN Progression in one test. Bisect not started yet. [CSIT-1740]
+ [4] DONE Progression in high performance tests due to Gerrit 26445.
+ TRex setting improvement. [CSIT-1740]
- [5] OPEN Progression in performance of tests running VPP (l2xc) inside VM.
- Due to relatively high stdev of results, bisecting has not found a cause yet.
+ [5] DONE Progression in tests with VPP (l2xc) inside a VM due to
+ Gerrit 25309. Make VPP in VM worker placement deterministic.
[CSIT-1738]
- [6] OPEN Regression in CSIT, one specific test showing too small stdev
- to be considered noise. Tentatively marking also other ipsec anomalies
- with this, although their stdev are high enough to be explained
- as maybe just noise. [CSIT-1742]
+ [6] DONE Apparent regression in CSIT is caused by VPP renaming
+ the most performant IPsec plugin, thus the current CSIT version used with
+ the previous VPP version measures the less performant VPP IPsec plugin.
+ [CSIT-1742]
[7] POSTPONED Possible anomaly, but stdev of results is high.
- Currently, the performance differences are considered to probably be just noise.
+ Performance differences considered to probably be just noise.
- [8] OPEN Regressions in some tests with VPP in VM and using l2xcbase as vswitch.
- The results have surprisingly small stdev, more investigation needed.
- [CSIT-1741]
+ [8] DONE Regressions in some tests with VPP in VM due to Gerrit
+ 26744. Switch to clang-9 compiler identified as cause. Tests using
+ l2xcbase as vswitch with small stdev used for bisect. [CSIT-1741]
- [9] OPEN Progression in ip6 scale tests. Multiple candidate changes may have
- affect code efficiency, but they have also caused the tests to fail
- for a period of time. [CSIT-1735]
+ [9] OPEN Progression in all ip6 scale tests. Changes to vppinfra
+ bihash may have improved code efficiency. [CSIT-1735]
[10] OPEN Progression in ip6 base tests with dot1q. [CSIT-1746]
- [11] OPEN Progression in memif tests, mainly in avf-eth-l2xcbase-eth-2memif-1dcr.
- Not sure whether all memif tests are affected, nor what the cause is.
- [CSIT-1744]
+ [11] OPEN Progression in memif tests, mainly in
+ avf-eth-l2xcbase-eth-2memif-1dcr. Two progression candidates found:
+ Gerrit 24053 and Gerrit 26744. Performance results are not consistent enough
+ to separate the two from other possible causes. [CSIT-1744]
[12] OPEN Progression in some l2bdscale tests. [CSIT-1745]
- [16] OPEN Progression in IPsec tests, only for aes128cbc-hmac512sha. [CSIT-1748]
+ [16] OPEN Apparent progression in IPsec tests, only for aes128cbc-hmac512sha.
+ Considering [6], the positive difference is not large enough,
+ so there was probably a VPP regression. [CSIT-1748]
[17] OPEN Progression in some vhost tests (dpdk in VM). [CSIT-1749]
"