{
api_main_t *am = &api_main;
- ASSERT (c->id > 0);
+ /*
+ * This happens during the java core tests if the message
+ * dictionary is missing newly added xxx_reply_t messages.
+ * Should never happen, but since I shot myself in the foot once
+ * this way, I thought I'd make it easy to debug if I ever do
+ * it again... (;-)...
+ */
+ if (c->id == 0)
+ {
+ if (c->name)
+ clib_warning ("Trying to register %s with a NULL msg id!", c->name);
+ else
+ clib_warning ("Trying to register a NULL msg with a NULL msg id!");
+ clib_warning ("Did you forget to call setup_message_id_table?");
+ return;
+ }
#define _(a) vec_validate (am->a, c->id);
foreach_msg_api_vector;
#undef _
- if (am->msg_names[c->id])
- clib_warning ("BUG: multiple registrations of 'vl_api_%s_t_handler'",
- c->name);
+ if (am->msg_handlers[c->id] && am->msg_handlers[c->id] != c->handler)
+ clib_warning
+ ("BUG: re-registering 'vl_api_%s_t_handler'."
+ "Handler was %llx, replaced by %llx",
+ c->name, am->msg_handlers[c->id], c->handler);
am->msg_names[c->id] = c->name;
am->msg_handlers[c->id] = c->handler;
vl_msg_api_config (c);
}
+void
+vl_msg_api_clean_handlers (int msg_id)
+{
+ vl_msg_api_msg_config_t cfg;
+ vl_msg_api_msg_config_t *c = &cfg;
+
+ memset (c, 0, sizeof (*c));
+
+ c->id = msg_id;
+ vl_msg_api_config (c);
+}
+
void
vl_msg_api_set_cleanup_handler (int msg_id, void *fp)
{
hash_set_mem (am->msg_index_by_name_and_crc, string, id);
}
+void
+vl_msg_api_add_version (api_main_t * am, const char *string,
+ u32 major, u32 minor, u32 patch)
+{
+ api_version_t version = {.major = major,.minor = minor,.patch = patch };
+ ASSERT (strlen (string) < 64);
+ strncpy (version.name, string, 64 - 1);
+ vec_add1 (am->api_version_list, version);
+}
/*
* fd.io coding-style-patch-verification: ON