X-Git-Url: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?a=blobdiff_plain;f=docs%2Freport%2Fhoneycomb_functional_tests%2Foverview.rst;h=3ff8a6e2e9d785f8b1240b58ef4badd3d0669e21;hb=468da48d3f3ced298ff8dccc76885157dff5cfe7;hp=741c2dd5e78c44ff40d4cdb2e4d283705e72d2ca;hpb=748a0bf24b872e15c94bd97acb80d723b1daf3c8;p=csit.git

diff --git a/docs/report/honeycomb_functional_tests/overview.rst b/docs/report/honeycomb_functional_tests/overview.rst
index 741c2dd5e7..3ff8a6e2e9 100644
--- a/docs/report/honeycomb_functional_tests/overview.rst
+++ b/docs/report/honeycomb_functional_tests/overview.rst
@@ -9,25 +9,24 @@ using :abbr:`VIRL (Virtual Internet Routing Lab)` simulation platform
 contributed by Cisco. VIRL runs on physical baremetal servers hosted by LF FD.io
 project. All tests are executed in two node logical test topology - Traffic
 Generator (TG) node and Systems Under Test (SUT1) node connected in a loop.
-Logical test topology is shown in the figure below.::
-
-                     +------------------------+
-                     |                        |
-                     |  +------------------+  |
-        +--------------->                  <--------------+
-        |            |  |                  |  |           |
-        |  |------------>       DUT1       <-----------+  |
-        |  |         |  +------------------+  |        |  |
-        |  |         |                        |        |  |
-        |  |         |                  SUT1  |        |  |
-        |  |         +------------------------+        |  |
-        |  |                                           |  |
-        |  |                                           |  |
-        |  |               +-----------+               |  |
-        |  +--------------->           <---------------+  |
-        |                  |    TG     |                  |
-        +------------------>           <------------------+
-                           +-----------+
+Logical test topology is shown in the figure below.
+
+.. only:: latex
+
+    .. raw:: latex
+
+        \begin{figure}[H]
+            \centering
+                \graphicspath{{../_tmp/src/vpp_performance_tests/}}
+                \includegraphics[width=0.90\textwidth]{logical-2n-nic2nic}
+                \label{fig:logical-2n-nic2nic}
+        \end{figure}
+
+.. only:: html
+
+    .. figure:: logical-2n-nic2nic.svg
+        :alt: logical-2n-nic2nic
+        :align: center
 
 SUT1 is a VM (Ubuntu or Centos, depending on the test suite), TG is a Traffic
 Generator (TG, another Ubuntu VM). SUTs run Honeycomb and VPP SW applications
@@ -46,7 +45,7 @@ for clarity).
 Functional Tests Coverage
 -------------------------
 
-The following Honeycomb functional test areas are included in the CSIT |release|
+The following Honeycomb functional test areas are included in the |csit-release|
 with results listed in this report:
 
 - **Basic interface management** - CRUD for interface state,
@@ -161,7 +160,7 @@ with results listed in this report:
   - Netconf/Restconf northbound over IPv6
   - Test case count: 12
 
-Total 219 Honeycomb functional tests in the CSIT |release|.
+Total 219 Honeycomb functional tests in the |csit-release|.
 
 Operational data in Honeycomb should mirror configuration data at all times.
 Because of this, test cases follow this general pattern:
@@ -179,7 +178,7 @@ the DUT node.
 Functional Tests Naming
 -----------------------
 
-CSIT |release| introduced a common structured naming convention for all
+CSIT-17.01 introduced a common structured naming convention for all
 performance and functional tests. This change was driven by substantially
 growing number and type of CSIT test cases. Firstly, the original practice did
 not always follow any strict naming convention. Secondly test names did not