From: Dave Barach <dave@barachs.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:44:11 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: Try again: __COVERITY__ vs __COVERITY
X-Git-Tag: v17.04-rc1~46
X-Git-Url: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3d6b2b5649fc2858c6ebc433a79c45d9bff3175e;p=vpp.git

Try again: __COVERITY__ vs __COVERITY

Hate it when that happens...

Change-Id: I725c8539d6349755e9d75ae05f2703c83ea704be
Signed-off-by: Dave Barach <dave@barachs.net>
---

diff --git a/src/vpp/api/api_main.c b/src/vpp/api/api_main.c
index d3764337b11..a59524cfcec 100644
--- a/src/vpp/api/api_main.c
+++ b/src/vpp/api/api_main.c
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ api_command_fn (vlib_main_t * vm,
 
   vam->vl_input_queue = am->shmem_hdr->vl_input_queue;
 
-#ifdef __COVERITY
+#ifdef __COVERITY__
   /*
    * Convince Coverity that it's not a NULL pointer...
    * Done once for real below, since we never vec_free(vam->inbuf);