From 3d6b2b5649fc2858c6ebc433a79c45d9bff3175e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Barach Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:44:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Try again: __COVERITY__ vs __COVERITY Hate it when that happens... Change-Id: I725c8539d6349755e9d75ae05f2703c83ea704be Signed-off-by: Dave Barach --- src/vpp/api/api_main.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/vpp/api/api_main.c b/src/vpp/api/api_main.c index d3764337b11..a59524cfcec 100644 --- a/src/vpp/api/api_main.c +++ b/src/vpp/api/api_main.c @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ api_command_fn (vlib_main_t * vm, vam->vl_input_queue = am->shmem_hdr->vl_input_queue; -#ifdef __COVERITY +#ifdef __COVERITY__ /* * Convince Coverity that it's not a NULL pointer... * Done once for real below, since we never vec_free(vam->inbuf); -- 2.16.6