Overview
========
+.. _tested_physical_topologies:
+
Tested Physical Topologies
--------------------------
CSIT VPP performance tests are executed on physical baremetal servers hosted by
-LF FD.io project. Testbed physical topology is shown in the figure below.
-
-::
-
- +------------------------+ +------------------------+
- | | | |
- | +------------------+ | | +------------------+ |
- | | | | | | | |
- | | <-----------------> | |
- | | DUT1 | | | | DUT2 | |
- | +--^---------------+ | | +---------------^--+ |
- | | | | | |
- | | SUT1 | | SUT2 | |
- +------------------------+ +------------------^-----+
- | |
- | |
- | +-----------+ |
- | | | |
- +------------------> TG <------------------+
- | |
- +-----------+
+:abbr:`LF (Linux Foundation)` FD.io project. Testbed physical topology is shown
+in the figure below.::
+
+ +------------------------+ +------------------------+
+ | | | |
+ | +------------------+ | | +------------------+ |
+ | | | | | | | |
+ | | <-----------------> | |
+ | | DUT1 | | | | DUT2 | |
+ | +--^---------------+ | | +---------------^--+ |
+ | | | | | |
+ | | SUT1 | | SUT2 | |
+ +------------------------+ +------------------^-----+
+ | |
+ | |
+ | +-----------+ |
+ | | | |
+ +------------------> TG <------------------+
+ | |
+ +-----------+
SUT1 and SUT2 are two System Under Test servers (Cisco UCS C240, each with two
Intel XEON CPUs), TG is a Traffic Generator (TG, another Cisco UCS C240, with
performance labs to address larger scale multi-interface and multi-NIC
performance testing scenarios.
-For test cases that require DUT (VPP) to communicate with
-VirtualMachines(VMs)/LinuxContainers(LXCs) over vhost-user/memif
-interfaces, N of VM/LXC instances are created on SUT1 and SUT2. For N=1
-DUT forwards packets between vhost/memif and physical interfaces. For
-N>1 DUT a logical service chain forwarding topology is created on DUT by
-applying L2 or IPv4/IPv6 configuration depending on the test suite. DUT
-test topology with N VM/LXC instances is shown in the figure below
-including applicable packet flow thru the DUTs and VMs/LXCs (marked in
-the figure with ``***``).
-
-::
-
- +-------------------------+ +-------------------------+
- | +---------+ +---------+ | | +---------+ +---------+ |
- | |VM/LXC[1]| |VM/LXC[N]| | | |VM/LXC[1]| |VM/LXC[N]| |
- | | ***** | | ***** | | | | ***** | | ***** | |
- | +--^---^--+ +--^---^--+ | | +--^---^--+ +--^---^--+ |
- | *| |* *| |* | | *| |* *| |* |
- | +--v---v-------v---v--+ | | +--v---v-------v---v--+ |
- | | * * * * |*|***********|*| * * * * | |
- | | * ********* ***<-|-----------|->*** ********* * | |
- | | * DUT1 | | | | DUT2 * | |
- | +--^------------------+ | | +------------------^--+ |
- | *| | | |* |
- | *| SUT1 | | SUT2 |* |
- +-------------------------+ +-------------------------+
- *| |*
- *| |*
- *| +-----------+ |*
- *| | | |*
- *+--------------------> TG <--------------------+*
- **********************| |**********************
- +-----------+
-
-For VM/LXC tests, packets are switched by DUT multiple times: twice for
-a single VM/LXC, three times for two VMs/LXCs, N+1 times for N VMs/LXCs.
-Hence the external throughput rates measured by TG and listed in this
-report must be multiplied by (N+1) to represent the actual DUT aggregate
-packet forwarding rate.
-
-Note that reported DUT (VPP) performance results are specific to the
-SUTs tested. Current LF FD.io SUTs are based on Intel XEON E5-2699v3
-2.3GHz CPUs. SUTs with other CPUs are likely to yield different results.
-A good rule of thumb, that can be applied to estimate VPP packet
+For service chain topology test cases that require DUT (VPP) to communicate with
+VirtualMachines (VMs) or with Linux/Docker Containers (Ctrs) over
+vhost-user/memif interfaces, N of VM/Ctr instances are created on SUT1
+and SUT2. Three types of service chain topologies are tested in CSIT |release|:
+
+#. "Parallel" topology with packets flowing from NIC via DUT (VPP) to
+ VM/Container and back to VPP and NIC;
+
+#. "Chained" topology (a.k.a. "Snake") with packets flowing via DUT (VPP) to
+ VM/Container, back to DUT, then to the next VM/Container, back to DUT and
+ so on until the last VM/Container in a chain, then back to DUT and NIC;
+
+#. "Horizontal" topology with packets flowing via DUT (VPP) to Container,
+ then via "horizontal" memif to the next Container, and so on until the
+ last Container, then back to DUT and NIC. "Horizontal" topology is not
+ supported for VMs;
+
+For each of the above topologies, DUT (VPP) is tested in a range of L2
+or IPv4/IPv6 configurations depending on the test suite. A sample DUT
+"Chained" service topology with N of VM/Ctr instances is shown in the
+figure below. Packet flow thru the DUTs and VMs/Ctrs is marked with
+``***``::
+
+ +-------------------------+ +-------------------------+
+ | +---------+ +---------+ | | +---------+ +---------+ |
+ | |VM/Ctr[1]| |VM/Ctr[N]| | | |VM/Ctr[1]| |VM/Ctr[N]| |
+ | | ***** | | ***** | | | | ***** | | ***** | |
+ | +--^---^--+ +--^---^--+ | | +--^---^--+ +--^---^--+ |
+ | *| |* *| |* | | *| |* *| |* |
+ | +--v---v-------v---v--+ | | +--v---v-------v---v--+ |
+ | | * * * * |*|***********|*| * * * * | |
+ | | * ********* ***<-|-----------|->*** ********* * | |
+ | | * DUT1 | | | | DUT2 * | |
+ | +--^------------------+ | | +------------------^--+ |
+ | *| | | |* |
+ | *| SUT1 | | SUT2 |* |
+ +-------------------------+ +-------------------------+
+ *| |*
+ *| |*
+ *| +-----------+ |*
+ *| | | |*
+ *+--------------------> TG <--------------------+*
+ **********************| |**********************
+ +-----------+
+
+In above "Chained" topology, packets are switched by DUT multiple times:
+twice for a single VM/Ctr, three times for two VMs/Ctrs, N+1 times for N
+VMs/Ctrs. Hence the external throughput rates measured by TG and listed
+in this report must be multiplied by (N+1) to represent the actual DUT
+aggregate packet forwarding rate.
+
+For a "Parallel" and "Horizontal" service topologies packets are always
+switched by DUT twice per service chain.
+
+Note that reported DUT (VPP) performance results are specific to the SUTs
+tested. Current :abbr:`LF (Linux Foundation)` FD.io SUTs are based on Intel
+XEON E5-2699v3 2.3GHz CPUs. SUTs with other CPUs are likely to yield different
+results. A good rule of thumb, that can be applied to estimate VPP packet
thoughput for Phy-to-Phy (NIC-to-NIC, PCI-to-PCI) topology, is to expect
the forwarding performance to be proportional to CPU core frequency,
assuming CPU is the only limiting factor and all other SUT parameters
equivalent to FD.io CSIT environment. The same rule of thumb can be also
-applied for Phy-to-VM/LXC-to-Phy (NIC-to-VM/LXC-to-NIC) topology, but
-due to much higher dependency on intensive memory operations and
-sensitivity to Linux kernel scheduler settings and behaviour, this
-estimation may not always yield good enough accuracy.
+applied for Phy-to-VM/Ctr-to-Phy (NIC-to-VM/Ctr-to-NIC) topology, but due to
+much higher dependency on intensive memory operations and sensitivity to Linux
+kernel scheduler settings and behaviour, this estimation may not always yield
+good enough accuracy.
+
+For detailed FD.io CSIT testbed specification and topology, as well as
+configuration and setup of SUTs and DUTs testbeds please refer to
+:ref:`test_environment`.
-For detailed LF FD.io test bed specification and physical topology
-please refer to
-`LF FD.io CSIT testbed wiki page <https://wiki.fd.io/view/CSIT/CSIT_LF_testbed>`_.
+Similar SUT compute node and DUT VPP settings can be arrived to in a
+standalone VPP setup by using a `vpp-config configuration tool
+<https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Configuration_Tool>`_ developed within the
+VPP project using CSIT recommended settings and scripts.
Performance Tests Coverage
--------------------------
Performance tests are split into two main categories:
- Throughput discovery - discovery of packet forwarding rate using binary search
- in accordance to RFC2544.
+ in accordance to :rfc:`2544`.
- NDR - discovery of Non Drop Rate packet throughput, at zero packet loss;
followed by one-way packet latency measurements at 10%, 50% and 100% of
VLAN tagged Ethernet frames.
- **L2BD** - L2 Bridge-Domain switched-forwarding of untagged Ethernet frames
with MAC learning; disabled MAC learning i.e. static MAC tests to be added.
+ - **L2BD Scale** - L2 Bridge-Domain switched-forwarding of untagged Ethernet
+ frames with MAC learning; disabled MAC learning i.e. static MAC tests to be
+ added with 20k, 200k and 2M FIB entries.
- **IPv4** - IPv4 routed-forwarding.
- **IPv6** - IPv6 routed-forwarding.
- **IPv4 Scale** - IPv4 routed-forwarding with 20k, 200k and 2M FIB entries.
of 2 VMs using vhost-user interfaces, with VPP forwarding modes incl. L2
Cross-Connect, L2 Bridge-Domain, VXLAN with L2BD, IPv4 routed-forwarding.
- **COP** - IPv4 and IPv6 routed-forwarding with COP address security.
- - **iACL** - IPv4 and IPv6 routed-forwarding with iACL address security.
+ - **ACL** - L2 Bridge-Domain switched-forwarding and IPv4 and IPv6 routed-
+ forwarding with iACL and oACL IP address, MAC address and L4 port security.
- **LISP** - LISP overlay tunneling for IPv4-over-IPv4, IPv6-over-IPv4,
IPv6-over-IPv6, IPv4-over-IPv6 in IPv4 and IPv6 routed-forwarding modes.
- **VXLAN** - VXLAN overlay tunnelling integration with L2XC and L2BD.
- **QoS Policer** - ingress packet rate measuring, marking and limiting
(IPv4).
- - **CGNAT** - Carrier Grade Network Address Translation tests with varying
+ - **NAT** - (Source) Network Address Translation tests with varying
number of users and ports per user.
+ - **Container memif connections** - VPP memif virtual interface tests to
+ interconnect VPP instances with L2XC and L2BD.
+ - **Container K8s Orchestrated Topologies** - Container topologies connected
+ over the memif virtual interface.
+ - **SRv6** - Segment Routing IPv6 tests.
- 2port40GE XL710 Intel
- **VMs with vhost-user** - virtual topologies with 1 VM and service chains
of 2 VMs using vhost-user interfaces, with VPP forwarding modes incl. L2
Cross-Connect, L2 Bridge-Domain, VXLAN with L2BD, IPv4 routed-forwarding.
- - **IPSec** - IPSec encryption with AES-GCM, CBC-SHA1 ciphers, in combination
- with IPv4 routed-forwarding.
+ - **IPSecSW** - IPSec encryption with AES-GCM, CBC-SHA1 ciphers, in
+ combination with IPv4 routed-forwarding.
+ - **IPSecHW** - IPSec encryption with AES-GCM, CBC-SHA1 ciphers, in
+ combination with IPv4 routed-forwarding. Intel QAT HW acceleration.
- **IPSec+LISP** - IPSec encryption with CBC-SHA1 ciphers, in combination
with LISP-GPE overlay tunneling for IPv4-over-IPv4.
+ - **VPP TCP/IP stack** - tests of VPP TCP/IP stack used with VPP built-in HTTP
+ server.
- 2port10GE X710 Intel
- **L2BD** - L2 Bridge-Domain switched-forwarding of untagged Ethernet frames
with MAC learning.
-Execution of performance tests takes time, especially the throughput
-discovery tests. Due to limited HW testbed resources available within
-FD.io labs hosted by Linux Foundation, the number of tests for NICs
-other than X520 (a.k.a. Niantic) has been limited to few baseline tests.
-CSIT team expect the HW testbed resources to grow over time, so that
-complete set of performance tests can be regularly and(or) continuously
-executed against all models of hardware present in FD.io labs.
+Execution of performance tests takes time, especially the throughput discovery
+tests. Due to limited HW testbed resources available within FD.io labs hosted
+by :abbr:`LF (Linux Foundation)`, the number of tests for NICs other than X520
+(a.k.a. Niantic) has been limited to few baseline tests. CSIT team expect the
+HW testbed resources to grow over time, so that complete set of performance
+tests can be regularly and(or) continuously executed against all models of
+hardware present in FD.io labs.
Performance Tests Naming
------------------------
-CSIT |release| follows a common structured naming convention for all
-performance and system functional tests, introduced in CSIT |release-1|.
+CSIT |release| follows a common structured naming convention for all performance
+and system functional tests, introduced in CSIT |release-1|.
-The naming should be intuitive for majority of the tests. Complete
-description of CSIT test naming convention is provided on `CSIT test naming wiki
+The naming should be intuitive for majority of the tests. Complete description
+of CSIT test naming convention is provided on `CSIT test naming wiki
<https://wiki.fd.io/view/CSIT/csit-test-naming>`_.
Methodology: Multi-Core and Multi-Threading
-------------------------------------------
-**Intel Hyper-Threading** - CSIT |release| performance tests are
-executed with SUT servers' Intel XEON processors configured in Intel
-Hyper-Threading Disabled mode (BIOS setting). This is the simplest
-configuration used to establish baseline single-thread single-core
-application packet processing and forwarding performance. Subsequent
-releases of CSIT will add performance tests with Intel Hyper-Threading
-Enabled (requires BIOS settings change and hard reboot of server).
+**Intel Hyper-Threading** - CSIT |release| performance tests are executed with
+SUT servers' Intel XEON processors configured in Intel Hyper-Threading Disabled
+mode (BIOS setting). This is the simplest configuration used to establish
+baseline single-thread single-core application packet processing and forwarding
+performance. Subsequent releases of CSIT will add performance tests with Intel
+Hyper-Threading Enabled (requires BIOS settings change and hard reboot of
+server).
-**Multi-core Tests** - CSIT |release| multi-core tests are executed in
-the following VPP thread and core configurations:
+**Multi-core Tests** - CSIT |release| multi-core tests are executed in the
+following VPP thread and core configurations:
#. 1t1c - 1 VPP worker thread on 1 CPU physical core.
#. 2t2c - 2 VPP worker threads on 2 CPU physical cores.
+#. 4t4c - 4 VPP worker threads on 4 CPU physical cores.
VPP worker threads are the data plane threads. VPP control thread is
running on a separate non-isolated core together with other Linux
processes. Note that in quite a few test cases running VPP workers on 2
-physical cores hits the tested NIC I/O bandwidth or packets-per-second
-limit.
+or 4 physical cores hits the I/O bandwidth or packets-per-second limit
+of tested NIC.
+
+Section :ref:`throughput_speedup_multi_core` includes a set of graphs
+illustrating packet throughout speedup when running VPP on multiple
+cores.
Methodology: Packet Throughput
------------------------------
Following values are measured and reported for packet throughput tests:
-- NDR binary search per RFC2544:
+- NDR binary search per :rfc:`2544`:
- Packet rate: "RATE: <aggregate packet rate in packets-per-second> pps
- (2x <per direction packets-per-second>)"
+ (2x <per direction packets-per-second>)";
- Aggregate bandwidth: "BANDWIDTH: <aggregate bandwidth in Gigabits per
- second> Gbps (untagged)"
+ second> Gbps (untagged)";
-- PDR binary search per RFC2544:
+- PDR binary search per :rfc:`2544`:
- Packet rate: "RATE: <aggregate packet rate in packets-per-second> pps (2x
- <per direction packets-per-second>)"
+ <per direction packets-per-second>)";
- Aggregate bandwidth: "BANDWIDTH: <aggregate bandwidth in Gigabits per
- second> Gbps (untagged)"
+ second> Gbps (untagged)";
- Packet loss tolerance: "LOSS_ACCEPTANCE <accepted percentage of packets
- lost at PDR rate>""
+ lost at PDR rate>";
- NDR and PDR are measured for the following L2 frame sizes:
- - IPv4: 64B, IMIX_v4_1 (28x64B,16x570B,4x1518B), 1518B, 9000B.
- - IPv6: 78B, 1518B, 9000B.
+ - IPv4: 64B, IMIX_v4_1 (28x64B,16x570B,4x1518B), 1518B, 9000B;
+ - IPv6: 78B, 1518B, 9000B;
+
+- NDR and PDR binary search resolution is determined by the final value of the
+ rate change, referred to as the final step:
+
+ - The final step is set to 50kpps for all NIC to NIC tests and all L2
+ frame sizes except 9000B (changed from 100kpps used in previous
+ releases).
+
+ - The final step is set to 10kpps for all remaining tests, including 9000B
+ and all vhost VM and memif Container tests.
All rates are reported from external Traffic Generator perspective.
Methodology: KVM VM vhost
-------------------------
-CSIT |release| introduced test environment configuration changes to KVM Qemu vhost-
-user tests in order to more representatively measure |vpp-release| performance
-in configurations with vhost-user interfaces and different Qemu settings.
+CSIT |release| introduced test environment configuration changes to KVM Qemu
+vhost-user tests in order to more representatively measure |vpp-release|
+performance in configurations with vhost-user interfaces and different Qemu
+settings.
-FD.io CSIT performance lab is testing VPP vhost with KVM VMs using following environment settings
+FD.io CSIT performance lab is testing VPP vhost with KVM VMs using following
+environment settings:
-- Tests with varying Qemu virtio queue (a.k.a. vring) sizes:
- [vr256] default 256 descriptors, [vr1024] 1024 descriptors to
- optimize for packet throughput;
+- Tests with varying Qemu virtio queue (a.k.a. vring) sizes: [vr256] default 256
+ descriptors, [vr1024] 1024 descriptors to optimize for packet throughput;
-- Tests with varying Linux CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler)
- settings: [cfs] default settings, [cfsrr1] CFS RoundRobin(1)
- policy applied to all data plane threads handling test packet
- path including all VPP worker threads and all Qemu testpmd
- poll-mode threads;
+- Tests with varying Linux :abbr:`CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler)` settings:
+ [cfs] default settings, [cfsrr1] CFS RoundRobin(1) policy applied to all data
+ plane threads handling test packet path including all VPP worker threads and
+ all Qemu testpmd poll-mode threads;
- Resulting test cases are all combinations with [vr256,vr1024] and
[cfs,cfsrr1] settings;
-- Adjusted Linux kernel CFS scheduler policy for data plane threads used
- in CSIT is documented in
+- Adjusted Linux kernel :abbr:`CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler)` scheduler policy
+ for data plane threads used in CSIT is documented in
`CSIT Performance Environment Tuning wiki <https://wiki.fd.io/view/CSIT/csit-perf-env-tuning-ubuntu1604>`_.
The purpose is to verify performance impact (NDR, PDR throughput) and
same test measurements repeatability, by making VPP and VM data plane
threads less susceptible to other Linux OS system tasks hijacking CPU
cores running those data plane threads.
-Methodology: LXC Container memif
---------------------------------
-
-CSIT |release| introduced new tests - VPP Memif virtual interface
-(shared memory interface) tests interconnecting VPP instances over
-memif. VPP vswitch instance runs in bare-metal user-mode handling Intel
-x520 NIC 10GbE interfaces and connecting over memif (Master side)
-virtual interfaces to another instance of VPP running in bare-metal
-Linux Container (LXC) with memif virtual interfaces (Slave side). LXC
-runs in a priviliged mode with VPP data plane worker threads pinned to
-dedicated physical CPU cores per usual CSIT practice. Both VPP run the
-same version of software. This test topology is equivalent to existing
-tests with vhost-user and VMs.
+Methodology: LXC and Docker Containers memif
+--------------------------------------------
+
+CSIT |release| introduced additional tests taking advantage of VPP memif
+virtual interface (shared memory interface) tests to interconnect VPP
+instances. VPP vswitch instance runs in bare-metal user-mode handling
+Intel x520 NIC 10GbE interfaces and connecting over memif (Master side)
+virtual interfaces to more instances of VPP running in :abbr:`LXC (Linux
+Container)` or in Docker Containers, both with memif virtual interfaces
+(Slave side). LXCs and Docker Containers run in a priviliged mode with
+VPP data plane worker threads pinned to dedicated physical CPU cores per
+usual CSIT practice. All VPP instances run the same version of software.
+This test topology is equivalent to existing tests with vhost-user and
+VMs as described earlier in :ref:`tested_physical_topologies`.
+
+More information about CSIT LXC and Docker Container setup and control
+is available in :ref:`container_orchestration_in_csit`.
+
+Methodology: Container Topologies Orchestrated by K8s
+-----------------------------------------------------
+
+CSIT |release| introduced new tests of Container topologies connected
+over the memif virtual interface (shared memory interface). In order to
+provide simple topology coding flexibility and extensibility container
+orchestration is done with `Kubernetes <https://github.com/kubernetes>`_
+using `Docker <https://github.com/docker>`_ images for all container
+applications including VPP. `Ligato <https://github.com/ligato>`_ is
+used to address the container networking orchestration that is
+integrated with K8s, including memif support.
+
+For these tests VPP vswitch instance runs in a Docker Container handling
+Intel x520 NIC 10GbE interfaces and connecting over memif (Master side)
+virtual interfaces to more instances of VPP running in Docker Containers
+with memif virtual interfaces (Slave side). All Docker Containers run in
+a priviliged mode with VPP data plane worker threads pinned to dedicated
+physical CPU cores per usual CSIT practice. All VPP instances run the
+same version of software. This test topology is equivalent to existing
+tests with vhost-user and VMs as described earlier in
+:ref:`tested_physical_topologies`.
+
+More information about CSIT Container Topologies Orchestrated by K8s is
+available in :ref:`container_orchestration_in_csit`.
Methodology: IPSec with Intel QAT HW cards
------------------------------------------
Methodology: TRex Traffic Generator Usage
-----------------------------------------
-The `TRex traffic generator <https://wiki.fd.io/view/TRex>`_ is used for all
+`TRex traffic generator <https://wiki.fd.io/view/TRex>`_ is used for all
CSIT performance tests. TRex stateless mode is used to measure NDR and PDR
throughputs using binary search (NDR and PDR discovery tests) and for quick
checks of DUT performance against the reference NDRs (NDR check tests) for
- TRex is started in the background mode
::
- $ sh -c 'cd /opt/trex-core-2.25/scripts/ && sudo nohup ./t-rex-64 -i -c 7 --iom 0 > /dev/null 2>&1 &' > /dev/null
+ $ sh -c 'cd <t-rex-install-dir>/scripts/ && sudo nohup ./t-rex-64 -i -c 7 --iom 0 > /tmp/trex.log 2>&1 &' > /dev/null
- There are traffic streams dynamically prepared for each test, based on traffic
profiles. The traffic is sent and the statistics obtained using
- trex_stl_lib.api.STLClient.
+ :command:`trex_stl_lib.api.STLClient`.
**Measuring packet loss**
If measurement of latency is requested, two more packet streams are created (one
for each direction) with TRex flow_stats parameter set to STLFlowLatencyStats. In
that case, returned statistics will also include min/avg/max latency values.
+
+Methodology: TCP/IP tests with WRK tool
+---------------------------------------
+
+`WRK HTTP benchmarking tool <https://github.com/wg/wrk>`_ is used for
+experimental TCP/IP and HTTP tests of VPP TCP/IP stack and built-in
+static HTTP server. WRK has been chosen as it is capable of generating
+significant TCP/IP and HTTP loads by scaling number of threads across
+multi-core processors.
+
+This in turn enables quite high scale benchmarking of the main TCP/IP
+and HTTP service including HTTP TCP/IP Connections-Per-Second (CPS),
+HTTP Requests-Per-Second and HTTP Bandwidth Throughput.
+
+The initial tests are designed as follows:
+
+- HTTP and TCP/IP Connections-Per-Second (CPS)
+
+ - WRK configured to use 8 threads across 8 cores, 1 thread per core.
+ - Maximum of 50 concurrent connections across all WRK threads.
+ - Timeout for server responses set to 5 seconds.
+ - Test duration is 30 seconds.
+ - Expected HTTP test sequence:
+
+ - Single HTTP GET Request sent per open connection.
+ - Connection close after valid HTTP reply.
+ - Resulting flow sequence - 8 packets: >S,<S-A,>A,>Req,<Rep,>F,<F,> A.
+
+- HTTP Requests-Per-Second
+
+ - WRK configured to use 8 threads across 8 cores, 1 thread per core.
+ - Maximum of 50 concurrent connections across all WRK threads.
+ - Timeout for server responses set to 5 seconds.
+ - Test duration is 30 seconds.
+ - Expected HTTP test sequence:
+
+ - Multiple HTTP GET Requests sent in sequence per open connection.
+ - Connection close after set test duration time.
+ - Resulting flow sequence: >S,<S-A,>A,>Req[1],<Rep[1],..,>Req[n],<Rep[n],>F,<F,>A.
Code Review / csit.git / blobdiff