From 71615399e194847d7833b744caedab9b841733e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Barach Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 09:09:05 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Keep RPC traffic off the shared-memory API queue Change-Id: Ib5c346641463768cf33eaf8cb5fab5b63171398d Signed-off-by: Dave Barach --- src/vlib/main.h | 1 + src/vlib/threads.c | 3 +++ src/vlibmemory/memory_api.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ src/vlibmemory/memory_api.h | 2 ++ src/vlibmemory/vlib_api.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/vlib/main.h b/src/vlib/main.h index 7c34fb6528d..64f2859c055 100644 --- a/src/vlib/main.h +++ b/src/vlib/main.h @@ -209,6 +209,7 @@ typedef struct vlib_main_t /* Vector of pending RPC requests */ uword *pending_rpc_requests; + clib_spinlock_t pending_rpc_lock; } vlib_main_t; diff --git a/src/vlib/threads.c b/src/vlib/threads.c index c99458ddaec..7ecfa309378 100644 --- a/src/vlib/threads.c +++ b/src/vlib/threads.c @@ -699,6 +699,9 @@ start_workers (vlib_main_t * vm) vlib_worker_threads->node_reforks_required = clib_mem_alloc_aligned (sizeof (u32), CLIB_CACHE_LINE_BYTES); + /* We'll need the rpc vector lock... */ + clib_spinlock_init (&vm->pending_rpc_lock); + /* Ask for an initial barrier sync */ *vlib_worker_threads->workers_at_barrier = 0; *vlib_worker_threads->wait_at_barrier = 1; diff --git a/src/vlibmemory/memory_api.c b/src/vlibmemory/memory_api.c index a444ec785a7..aa0e25b72e5 100644 --- a/src/vlibmemory/memory_api.c +++ b/src/vlibmemory/memory_api.c @@ -703,6 +703,26 @@ vl_mem_api_handle_msg_main (vlib_main_t * vm, vlib_node_runtime_t * node) am->shmem_hdr->vl_input_queue); } +int +vl_mem_api_handle_rpc (vlib_main_t * vm, vlib_node_runtime_t * node) +{ + api_main_t *am = &api_main; + int i; + uword *rpc_requests, mp; + + clib_spinlock_lock_if_init (&vm->pending_rpc_lock); + rpc_requests = vm->pending_rpc_requests; + + for (i = 0; i < vec_len (rpc_requests); i++) + { + mp = rpc_requests[i]; + vl_msg_api_handler_with_vm_node (am, (void *) mp, vm, node); + } + vec_reset_length (vm->pending_rpc_requests); + clib_spinlock_unlock_if_init (&vm->pending_rpc_lock); + return 0; +} + int vl_mem_api_handle_msg_private (vlib_main_t * vm, vlib_node_runtime_t * node, u32 reg_index) diff --git a/src/vlibmemory/memory_api.h b/src/vlibmemory/memory_api.h index 4cda04b3d9f..f6580067d46 100644 --- a/src/vlibmemory/memory_api.h +++ b/src/vlibmemory/memory_api.h @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ void vl_mem_api_dead_client_scan (api_main_t * am, vl_shmem_hdr_t * shm, int vl_mem_api_handle_msg_main (vlib_main_t * vm, vlib_node_runtime_t * node); int vl_mem_api_handle_msg_private (vlib_main_t * vm, vlib_node_runtime_t * node, u32 reg_index); +int vl_mem_api_handle_rpc (vlib_main_t * vm, vlib_node_runtime_t * node); + vl_api_registration_t *vl_mem_api_client_index_to_registration (u32 handle); void vl_mem_api_enable_disable (vlib_main_t * vm, int yesno); u32 vl_api_memclnt_create_internal (char *, svm_queue_t *); diff --git a/src/vlibmemory/vlib_api.c b/src/vlibmemory/vlib_api.c index b72f1335c29..21f112b8f14 100644 --- a/src/vlibmemory/vlib_api.c +++ b/src/vlibmemory/vlib_api.c @@ -346,7 +346,8 @@ vl_api_clnt_process (vlib_main_t * vm, vlib_node_runtime_t * node, start_time = vlib_time_now (vm); while (1) { - if (vl_mem_api_handle_msg_main (vm, node)) + if (vl_mem_api_handle_rpc (vm, node) + || vl_mem_api_handle_msg_main (vm, node)) { vm->api_queue_nonempty = 0; VL_MEM_API_LOG_Q_LEN ("q-underflow: len %d", 0); @@ -564,36 +565,16 @@ vl_api_rpc_call_reply_t_handler (vl_api_rpc_call_reply_t * mp) void vl_api_send_pending_rpc_requests (vlib_main_t * vm) { - api_main_t *am = &api_main; - vl_shmem_hdr_t *shmem_hdr = am->shmem_hdr; - svm_queue_t *q; - int i; - - /* - * Use the "normal" control-plane mechanism for the main thread. - * Well, almost. if the main input queue is full, we cannot - * block. Otherwise, we can expect a barrier sync timeout. - */ - q = shmem_hdr->vl_input_queue; + vlib_main_t *vm_global = &vlib_global_main; - for (i = 0; i < vec_len (vm->pending_rpc_requests); i++) - { - while (pthread_mutex_trylock (&q->mutex)) - vlib_worker_thread_barrier_check (); - - while (PREDICT_FALSE (svm_queue_is_full (q))) - { - pthread_mutex_unlock (&q->mutex); - vlib_worker_thread_barrier_check (); - while (pthread_mutex_trylock (&q->mutex)) - vlib_worker_thread_barrier_check (); - } - - vl_msg_api_send_shmem_nolock (q, (u8 *) (vm->pending_rpc_requests + i)); + /* Our own RPCs are already pending */ + if (vm == vm_global) + return; - pthread_mutex_unlock (&q->mutex); - } - _vec_len (vm->pending_rpc_requests) = 0; + clib_spinlock_lock_if_init (&vm_global->pending_rpc_lock); + vec_append (vm_global->pending_rpc_requests, vm->pending_rpc_requests); + vec_reset_length (vm->pending_rpc_requests); + clib_spinlock_unlock_if_init (&vm_global->pending_rpc_lock); } always_inline void @@ -601,6 +582,7 @@ vl_api_rpc_call_main_thread_inline (void *fp, u8 * data, u32 data_length, u8 force_rpc) { vl_api_rpc_call_t *mp; + vlib_main_t *vm_global = &vlib_global_main; vlib_main_t *vm = vlib_get_main (); /* Main thread and not a forced RPC: call the function directly */ @@ -626,7 +608,12 @@ vl_api_rpc_call_main_thread_inline (void *fp, u8 * data, u32 data_length, mp->function = pointer_to_uword (fp); mp->need_barrier_sync = 1; + /* Add to the pending vector. Thread 0 requires locking. */ + if (vm == vm_global) + clib_spinlock_lock_if_init (&vm_global->pending_rpc_lock); vec_add1 (vm->pending_rpc_requests, (uword) mp); + if (vm == vm_global) + clib_spinlock_unlock_if_init (&vm_global->pending_rpc_lock); } /* -- 2.16.6