} fp_nh;
/**
* The FIB table index in which to find the next-hop.
- * This needs to be fixed. We should lookup the adjacencies in
- * a separate table of adjacencies, rather than from the FIB.
- * Two reasons I can think of:
- * - consider:
- * int ip addr Gig0 10.0.0.1/24
- * ip route 10.0.0.2/32 via Gig1 192.168.1.2
- * ip route 1.1.1.1/32 via Gig0 10.0.0.2
- * this is perfectly valid.
- * Packets addressed to 10.0.0.2 should be sent via Gig1.
- * Packets address to 1.1.1.1 should be sent via Gig0.
- * when we perform the adj resolution from the FIB for the path
- * "via Gig0 10.0.0.2" the lookup will result in the route via Gig1
- * and so we will pick up the adj via Gig1 - which was not what the
- * operator wanted.
- * - we can only return link-type IPv4 and so not the link-type MPLS.
- * more on this in a later commit.
- *
- * The table ID should only belong to a recursive path and indicate
- * which FIB should be used to resolve the next-hop.
*/
fib_node_index_t fp_tbl_id;
} recursive;
}
else
{
- return (FIB_FORW_CHAIN_TYPE_MPLS_EOS);
+ return (FIB_FORW_CHAIN_TYPE_MPLS_NON_EOS);
}
}
return (FIB_FORW_CHAIN_TYPE_UNICAST_IP4);
fei = fib_table_entry_special_add(path->recursive.fp_tbl_id,
&pfx,
FIB_SOURCE_RR,
- FIB_ENTRY_FLAG_NONE,
- ADJ_INDEX_INVALID);
+ FIB_ENTRY_FLAG_NONE);
path = fib_path_get(path_index);
path->fp_via_fib = fei;
}
int
-fib_path_is_recursive (fib_node_index_t path_index)
+fib_path_is_recursive_constrained (fib_node_index_t path_index)
{
fib_path_t *path;
path = fib_path_get(path_index);
- return (FIB_PATH_TYPE_RECURSIVE == path->fp_type);
+ return ((FIB_PATH_TYPE_RECURSIVE == path->fp_type) &&
+ ((path->fp_cfg_flags & FIB_PATH_CFG_FLAG_RESOLVE_ATTACHED) ||
+ (path->fp_cfg_flags & FIB_PATH_CFG_FLAG_RESOLVE_HOST)));
}
int